Skip to main content

A growing threats from STIs?



Working as a sex and relationship educator means I am always learning new things.

I was reading this article on the BBC website looking at several new outbreaks of syphilis among heterosexual teenagers in the UK. For me this is an especially worrying development because this is not the only STI that is getting ready for a come back. It has also been recorded that gonorrhea is becoming resistant to antibiotics. HIV also seems poised for a resurgence in the EU. If STIs continue to develop and return bigger and badder then before the role of sexual health workers could become more vital then ever. 

In my work we focus on both the emotional, social and physical aspects of both sex and relationships. It is a key unique theme of our work to help young people deal with the emotional side, an element that some providers skip to target the biological risks. Whilst I feel this is damaging in the long term I can see the point in responding to the biological risk under increasing pressure of these growing threats. With a robust early intervention programme we could equip a generation to deal with these emerging threats. Such a programme could save lives and save thousands of pounds in treatment. Yet no UK government would pay out the money for such a useful early intervention process even in the face of such obvious threats. Sadly this leads on to a sad truth for those working in sexual health prevention. We may never get the funding we deserve from the government. 


The BBC article does make it clear that in regards to syphilis we are still talking about relatively small numbers. The worry is of course that these small numbers are warning signs of a larger problem that is yet to develop. In the work we currently do in Chester schools we have constantly continued to provide education about syphilis because although it is rare it is not extinct and if learning about syphilis also backs up teh prevention we are encouraging for Chlamydia and other STIs why would we leave it out. We have found that the mention of syphilis within the school setting can sometimes help embed the information because of links students make with History about kings and noble men/women suffering from it. 


In Chester we will continue providing education on a variety of STIs avoiding teh temptation to streamline and focus on only one or two most common. Why? because we never know which STI is going to bounce back bigger and badder then before. 











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A RSE reading list

Sometimes people ask me what reading I recommend around RSE, so I thought I would put together a bit of a list.  Key (free) articles and reports  Young people’s RSE UK poll  Sex Education Forum (2018) RSE outcome variations due to facilitator differences  Young et al (2018) What do young people think about their school-based sex and relationship education? A qualitative synthesis of young people's views and experiences Pound et al. (2016) Review of sexual abuse in schools and college s Ofsted (2021) National and International RSE Guidance  UNESCO international guidance on RSE  UNESCO (2018) England   Department for Education full guidance on statutory relationships education, relationships and sex education (RSE) and health education  Department for Education (2019) Wales Curriculum for Wales guidance and code for Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE)  (Consultation stage) Welsh Government (2021)  Scotland  Guidance for teachers on the conduct of teaching relationships, sex

Agree - Disagree Sex and Relationship Statements

Today I shared another resource listing the agree disagree statement I often use in Relationship lessons. I find agree disagree activities as a bit of a two edge sword. Sometimes they are great and sometimes they just seem flat.  I think agree/disagree activities work well if young people in the group do not all think the same. The true value in agree/disagree activities is the discussion it can stir up. The discussion is the point where young people learn things and develop their attitudes. The statements need to be crafted to try and divide opinion and stir up this discussion. When the statements do not divide group opinion then rarely will I get a good follow up discussion. The problem is that the statements that work well for one group do not work for another group.  The temptation is to try and pick truly controversial issues but I have had as much success with the historically controversial issues (abortion, porn etc) as the more standard issues (loyalty, respect, condo