Skip to main content

Sex and Relationship Education across the sexuality spectrum

Today I read this article by Louise Tickle "Does Sex Education exclude young gay people?" Personally in my work I have always tried to be gender and sexuality neutral in all my lessons. I always use the term "partners" or using the full phrase "a boyfriend or girlfriend" in every sentence to any gender student. But sometimes I still find myself falling into hetronormative language. It is not a choice but an unconscious accident. 

For example I had a interesting situation doing a condom demonstration in a school with a girl constantly talking over me (which I find so annoying). 

I asked " Please listen for a few minutes then you could speak with your friends."  
She replied. "But I don't need to know this" 
I replied "you never know what might happen in the future and it both a male and a females shared responsibility to know how to minimize risks" 
"But I don't need to know this" 
I plowed on "it is good to be prepared with information, even if you never plan on using a condom during sex" 
"But I don't need to know this because I'm a lesbian "

I felt like a fool, plowing on, insisting it was relevant and she was just trying to get out of trouble for talking over me. I suspect I'm not the only person who has made similar gaffs. But it highlights how easily people can get caught being insensitive on the topic of sex. In this situation once we had the class going on the condom applications I went over and talked through dental dams in more details for her. I wanted to make sure she was still getting the key information about minimizing STI risks. 

This incident also raises another connected issue. I wish schools would give us more time to cover dental dams for cunnilingus and analingus, especially for those young gay people. Sadly teachers have actively asked me not to go into the details of dental dams. As the think it is too explicit!? but condoms application is very much wanted?. This doesn't seem fair or right. I believe that current sexual trends will encourage more young people, of all sexualities, to experiment with cunnilingus and analingus. I think we need to make room for dental dam in the SRE curriculum. But with the SRE curriculum being squeezed on all sides how can we include it without missing something else out?

P.S. My offline work has been so busy I have not posted for some time. One of my new year aims is to make this a higher priority. Hopefully this will mean more post about more topics. 


  1. The student shows a limited view when she stated "But I don't need to know this because I'm a lesbian" Why should lesbians exclude themselves from safe sexual practices? STI's can be passed on through female to female sex, so lesbians should always practice safe sex by using condoms/female condoms and dams. Covering sex toys with condoms is another way of protecting yourself. Regardless of a person's sexual orientation they have a responsibility to protect themselves and others from infections. Regardless of how she saw her need, she clearly has no manners, it is rude to talk over or during a teaching session as it disturbs everyone and while she felt she had no need the person she was talking to may have had a need to know. J Wild Sexual Health Trainer

  2. Hello Janet,

    Thank you for your comment. It is true she was expressing a limited view point and after the initial conversation I spoke one on one and she saw the importance of learning about general safe sex practice. At the time i did not think about the covering of sex toys (even though i know it in theory) Thank you for reminding me. i will make sure I keep that in mind if the situation ever happens again.

    People talking over me always gets me SO annoyed even though I clearly remember as a school pupil myself getting confused why teachers got so mad. Now i understand. I feel I owe my old teachers an apology :)


Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agree - Disagree Sex and Relationship Statements

Today I shared another resource listing the agree disagree statement I often use in Relationship lessons. I find agree disagree activities as a bit of a two edge sword. Sometimes they are great and sometimes they just seem flat. 

I think agree/disagree activities work well if young people in the group do not all think the same. The true value in agree/disagree activities is the discussion it can stir up. The discussion is the point where young people learn things and develop their attitudes. The statements need to be crafted to try and divide opinion and stir up this discussion. When the statements do not divide group opinion then rarely will I get a good follow up discussion. The problem is that the statements that work well for one group do not work for another group. 

The temptation is to try and pick truly controversial issues but I have had as much success with the historically controversial issues (abortion, porn etc) as the more standard issues (loyalty, respect, condoms, etc). T…

Playing with figures of sexual health

A single research project can be reported on in different ways depending on what you want to do. Take the following two articles both reporting on the same research by the Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine. The research shows how many girls in the study thought the HPV vaccine also reduced their risk of catching other STIs. 

The daily mail report emphasis 1 in 4, I believe this is because they are trying to show how it is a big problem. Where as Health News states "show that a small percentage of girls" I believe this is because they are trying to show it is not a big problem. Both quoting the same study with the same figure of 23.6% of girls having the HPV vaccine believing it will reduce their risk of catching other STIs. 

Now this is a common o…

Review of Channel 4's Sex in Class

Review of Channel 4's Sex in Class from a relationship and sex educator's perspective.In this review I will try and bring my perspective as a relationship and sex educator to look at Channel 4's one off show Sex In Class. The show is about a Belgian sexologist Goedele Liekens testing out her approach to relationship and sex education for 15-16 year olds at a Lancashire school. You can read some great overall reviews from Jules Hillier at Brook and Sam Wollaston at the Guardian  of the show. In this blog I am trying to focus specifically on my my perspective as a relationship and sex educator on Goedele's content and approach. 

The show starts with a pretty unsurprising statistic of "83% of kids have seen porn by the time they are 13" (source not cited) and goes on to show how teachers at this school don't think current RSE is good enough and also gives some quotes from young people involved. Such as "It [porn] doesn't give you a lot of information…